add share buttons
Studies on IVC filter Lawsuits and Its Risks

Studies on IVC filter Lawsuits and Its Risks

Inferior Vena Cava filters (IVC) are designed to catch blood clots before they move into the lungs. Roughly 200,000 blood clot filters are implanted to prevent pulmonary embolisms each year, with the market expected to reach $435 million in 2015, according to the Axis Research Mind firm.  And If you have been injured by a blood clot filter, or had an IVC filter, then you can contact bard IVC Filter Lawsuit settlement Lawyers.

Surgeons often choose to implant IVC filters when patients with pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis have contraindications to anticoagulation drugs.

Symptoms of IVC complications:

The Washington Post told the story of patient Heidi Gribble Camp who had an IVC filter implanted after nearly dying from a blood clot during a ruptured ectopic pregnancy. The doctors assured her that leaving the device in would prevent problems in future pregnancies.

Over the next few years, a series of symptoms came and went intermittently – heart racing, flushed face, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and crippling back pain.

FDA safety communication & studies on IVC filter risks:

In recent years, there have been a number of troubling studies, reports and FDA safety communications pertaining to IVC filter complications that have led to increased awareness of the product’s unpublished risks and fueled litigation:

Researchers found that a quarter of those patients did not need the filter and were unable to reach a consensus on the remaining 23 percent of cases, but they found that IVC filter patients had a much higher in-hospital mortality rate (nearly double) and urged that further research be conducted to establish clearer guidelines for use.

Researchers noted that “many IVC filters placed after trauma were inserted when the highest bleeding risk had subsided, and anticoagulant therapy may have been appropriate.”

The Lehmann Report: C.R. Bard began receiving complaints of device loosening, fracturing and migration as early as 2004. Without reporting their concerns to the FDA, the company instead consulted with Dr. John Lehmann to compare newer models to older models to see if they had improved the rate of failure. You can get more information related to the IVC Filter lawsuit including the latest IVC Filter defects and recalls by online .

IVC filter lawsuits consolidated: So many similar claims entered the courts around the same time that litigation has been consolidated under Judge Richard L. Young under MDL 2570 in the U.S.

IVC filter manufacturers defend their products: Manufacturers argue that they are not at fault in these cases because “the patients’ doctors are highly sophisticated consumers” who choose to implant the products and are responsible for their monitoring once inside a patient.

Comments are closed.